Johnny Carson by Henry Bushkin

carson.JPG

The lovable, perpetually smiling comedic genius America knew so well, Johnny Carson, was an entirely different person beneath the facade.

He raged internally, author Henry Bushkin suggests in his new book by the comedian's name, because of the cold mother who refused to offer him any affection, no matter how successful and enormously popular he became. Johnny Carson, beautifully crafted with anecdotes, is so laden with examples of her boorish behavior it makes me wonder if Carson's mother suffered from mental illness.

Bushkin describes his intensely close business/personal relationship over 20 years as Carson's attorney, adviser, drinking budding, tennis pal, globe trotter and multiple other roles the tormented comedian demanded. But the two men were not friends as any normal person would define that term, even though Carson himself once told a reporter that Bushkin was his "best friend." But the author said there was no doubt who was in charge, because when Carson barked, Bushkin came running.

He describes both Carson's remarkable and enduring talents, as well as the prima donna syndrome the Tonight Show host suffered from. He'd explode in anger if the slightest thing went wrong. Carson particularly liked to blame whomever he was closest to for whatever problem just occurred, and that often was the author. Being a punching bag was part of the job requirement to float in the star's orbit.

For example, Bushkin says Carson once railed at him after the big stock crash in 1987 and why he didn't get him out of the market earlier. He played plenty of roles for Carson, but the author says he had nothing to do with stock picking! Carson had somebody else for that.

Carson's personal life was a shambles by any measure. A four-time husband, he admitted to Bushkin in one of their first meetings that he "wasn't good at marriage" and that the attorney always needed to remember that. Indeed. Three divorces caused the comedian a fortune and he was separated from #4 when he died alone from emphysema. Carson was a four-pack-a-day smoker.

Being so famous and wealthy attracted an endless stream of beautiful women who apparently didn't care a whit that the guy was married.

For Carson, Bushkin explains, marriage was a desirable and natural state because it provided a home, stability and somebody always at the ready to accompany him at social functions. Apparently, its value ended there. The man described in this book had no interest in an actual relationship or real intimacy--with anybody! He had demands, both personally and professionally, and anybody who failed to meet them was banished from his kingdom, never to be spoken to again. Eventually his longtime adviser, Bushkin, joined that list.

What was so striking about this narrative is that Johnny Carson was such a charismatic figure that people would do and give up almost anything to please him. The author himself admits to eventually emulating Johnny's relationship habits and blew his role as husband and father to what appears to be a wonderful family. Buskin's wife finally tired of Johnny always coming first.

How about all of these wives? His indiscretions were not secrets to them, yet they signed on for this. He often gave expensive jewelry to wives who caught him with his pants down. But eventually, they, or he, had enough, too and the legal process ensued.

Carson's personality, as described, strongly resembles that of other artistic geniuses, including Steve Jobs, Elvis Presley and Frank Sinatra. Would their success not have been possible had they been able to relate to others in a healthy way? My psychiatrist friends could certainly pontificate on that one for a while.

The more positive aspects of Johnny Carson's persona are also richly detailed. Bushkin describes how Johnny calls him into his office to claim that somebody is stealing cash out of his wallet every single day. He kept about $1,500 in his pocket at all times, in addition to a 38-special.

They installed cameras in his office and sure enough, one of his office assistants was shown lifting the cash out of his jacket pocket. You'd think the tyrant we've been reading about would have immediately fired the guy. But no. Johnny gave him a raise!

Carson genuinely liked him because he otherwise did an excellent job. I guess he figured if the man needed money that badly a raise would stop the stealing.

Carson was also known to send off large checks, including a $100,000 one to a restaurant owner who fell on hard times, when somebody close was struggling. He had all the cash in the world with which to be generous and live a lavish lifestyle. Despite it all, from the Rolls Royces to the mansions to the gorgeous babes and public adoration, I felt sorry for this man. He did not have a wonderful life, but he did enrich ours. Until I read Johnny Carson, I did not know that.

Bushkin described Carson as a complex man. Indeed he was.

Posted on December 15, 2013 .

Memoirs: SAIL Luncheon Nov. 22, 2013, Madison

"I thought the cow was eating him," the doctor explained. This was among the memoir examples I told to a great luncheon audience at Attic Angel last month. You can hear the entire presentation by clicking the player below.

Steve Busalacchi speaking to SAIL.

Steve Busalacchi speaking to SAIL.

Posted on December 5, 2013 .

Ira Roth: Wacky Wednesday

A person named Ira Roth popped into the news back in 1998. What did Mr. Roth do for a living back then?

1. He was a Roth IRA specialist for a mutual fund company

 

2. He was a soldier in the Irish Republican Army.

 

Scroll down for the answer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer: #1. Ira Roth was a specialist in Roth IRAs for Strong Mutual Funds.

Posted on December 4, 2013 .

"There's a girl in my bed."

Witte.jpg

I attended UW Madison in the early '80s when a fascinating situation occurred on the tenth floor of my dorm, Witte Hall. In those days, an upper classman was assigned to be the "house fellow." He or she would help Freshmen transition to campus life, as well as address other issues associated with living in the dorms. Our house fellow was a jovial guy named Maurice who had to deal with one of those other "issues."

Identical twin brothers lived on my dorm floor, both of whom were very talented pianists, but one painfully shy. He was a nice guy who barely said a word and when he did, you had to lean in to hear him.

One evening, the quiet kid, Tom, gets out of bed in the middle of the night and knocks on Maurice's door. Glassy-eyed, the house fellow opens his door and finds Tom, standing there.

"There's a girl in my bed," Tom deadpans.

"Well, good for you," cracks Maurice, half-asleep. "Why are you bothering me?" he asks.

"No, no…" Tom starts to explain. "I have no idea who she is. She just walked into my room and climbed into my bed. She's still there."

Maurice shakes his head, gets dressed and goes down the hall to investigate. A house fellow's work is never done.

Sure enough, there's a drunken young lady sleeping in Tom's bed. I don't recall whether or not she had clothes on, so I imagine she did. I'd have remembered a naked girl in his bed. Much better story, but I digress…

In any case, it turns out, shockingly, that this student had way too many drinks, stepped onto the elevator in the right building, road it to the tenth floor, walked down the hall and entered "her room." The problem was that she lived on the ninth floor and not the tenth! She did, however, go to the right-numbered room on the correct side of the hall. Those hallways do indeed look identical.

 I've always thought that of all the wrong rooms to stumble into inebriated, in an entire dorm filled with horny guys, this one was by far her safest miss. It's the one you'd hope your daughter wanders into, if she were to make a similar room-identification error while tipsy.

Think of the quietest, introverted person you've ever met and you will know Tom—the guy who complained to his house fellow about a college girl who hopped into his bed in the middle of the night.

Posted on December 2, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesday: Jack Armstrong

Jack Armstrong is ...

1. an arm wrestler.

2. a pitcher.

3. a weight lifter

 

The answer is at the bottom of the page.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jack Armstrong pitched for several major league teams, including the Rangers from 1988-1994.

Posted on November 27, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesday: Linda Toote

Linda Toote is a...

1. G-I specialist who specializes in flatulence

2. flutist

3. service technician for a horn company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The answer is...Linda Toote is a flutist, formerly playing for the Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra.

Posted on November 20, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesday: Steve Small

Steve Small is a...

1. dwarf

2. nanotechnology expert

3. human development specialist

 The answer is on the bottom of this page.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Steve Small is a human development specialist.

Posted on November 13, 2013 .

What do you know?

We had a speaker at our Madison South Rotary club meeting yesterday refer to Don Rumsfeld's famous quote about what we know and don't know. Honestly, I couldn't quite follow his point because there were just too many "knowns" and "unknowns" rapidly thrown into his sentences! In any case, take a look at the Rumsfeld quote below or watch it here: 

"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - - the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones."

Donald H. Rumsfeld, Department of Defense news briefing, February 12, 2002

Wouldn't it have been easier for Rumsfeld to say there are things we know about and things we do not know about? And, there are things we cannot predict (unknown unknowns). This last one is the phrase I have the most trouble with, but the whole quote is a complete disaster in my opinion.

The British Plain English Campaign agreed with me, having awarded the Defense Secretary its Foot in Mouth award. 

A better twist on this is something I read that describes four kinds of people who live in the world: 

1. Those who know and know they know. (experts)

2. Those who know, but don't know they know. (They rely on good evidence and experts but don't personally gather it or have such expertise). 

3. Those who don't know, and know they don't know. (liars) 

4. Those who don't know, and don't know they don't know.  (gullible, lazy people)

#4 is the scariest of all. 

 

Posted on November 5, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesday: Phil Scales. Who is he?

The wacky name for today is Phil Scales. What does he do? 

 

1. Orchestra fund raiser

2. Washes skyscraper windows

3. Deep sea fisherman

 

 

 

The answer appears at the bottom of this page. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Answer:

 

1. Phil Scales is the Development Director for the Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on October 30, 2013 .

Erasing Death by Sam Parnia, MD

erasingdeath.JPG

Death is a fascinating topic, and one Dr. Sam Parnia takes very seriously. His book, Erasing Death, opens with a very hopeful narrative describing how patients who are clinically dead are in fact brought back to life. He says all those people who perished on the Titanic 100 years ago would have been excellent candidates for resuscitation under modern medical techniques, which include the cooling of the body to preserve brain function.

But Parnia, a resuscitation medicine specialist, says medical science is in the infancy of standardizing treatments for people who suffer a reversible death. One's chances will depend on what hospital he is taken to, what physicians happen to be practicing that day, their level of training, what equipment might be at their disposal, etc. Astoundingly, people who have been clinically dead for hours can be brought back to life with minimal or no brain damage if the medical issue that caused their death (a clot, for instance) can be repaired in time and their bodies were properly cooled in the meantime.

While Parnia's book spends a lot of time discussing how this can be achieved and the tremendous potential for reviving stricken patients, he also delves into an area that can only be described as the spiritual or supernatural. And that is the other side of this topic. There is a growing population of people who were once "dead" who are able to describe what that death experience was like. He tells of patients who are clinically dead, meaning they have no pulse, their hearts have stopped and their pupils become dilated because there is no longer blood circulation. So how can they possibly describe anything after they are revived?

Before we get to that, Parnia describes circumstances where patients can recount what was said in the OR and by whom while they were dead. Uncannily, many tell a similar story of floating above their bodies while medical personnel work on them. This has occurred across cultures, ages, religious beliefs and even among atheists. The case I found particularly amazing is that of a young boy who was dead and later told of a kindly woman who helped him while he was dead. When asked who this was, he had no idea. His mother then showed him a picture of his deceased grandmother that he apparently had never met and he said that was the lady!

Others in this unique fraternity of survivors have also described deceased relatives at their side or the presence of heavenly being. Parnia has no explanation for this from a scientific standpoint so he has begun a study involving the experiences of people who have been dead. He says only 10% or so of those who've been brought back have any memory of the experience. But among those who do, their recollections are incredibly similar.

This book makes a strong case for the self or the soul continuing on after death, which is exactly what happens to brain cells. That is not science fiction. When we die, our bodies don't completely die immediately. The brain cells linger on for a while, especially when the body is cooled, even though the heart has stopped. What happens in this interim period is what makes for great dinner conversation.

Posted on October 29, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesday's Cool!

OK, wacky word fans. I'm reading a great book now, which mentioned this notable person: His name is John Freese.

What is he credited for doing? Your choices are below:

 

John Freese...

1.  Invented the Icee drink.

2. Helps wrongfully convicted inmates.

3. Pioneered the cooling of cardiac arrest patients to preserve brain health.

 

The answer is at the bottom of the page. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The correct answer is #3. John Freese, MD, pioneered the cooling of cardiac arrest patients, so once revived, they are much more likely to have intact brain function. The book is Erasing Death by Sam Parnia, MD. I'll blog about it when I am finished reading it. 

 

 

Posted on October 23, 2013 .

Wacky Wednesdays!

I am a bit of a fanatic regarding names in the news, which for a variety of reasons, are interesting because of occupation, context or irony. They're known as aptronyms or apt names. This hobby is an offshoot of my love of wordplay, i.e. Scrabble.

 So in addition to the names in my book, Wacky News Names, I am going to post one new name I've discovered each Wacky Wednesday. However, you will have to guess why he or she made the list. So here goes, the first entry is... 

 

A humor book by Stephen J. Busalacchi

A humor book by Stephen J. Busalacchi

Scott Speed

1. He won a typing contest.

2. He is a race car driver

3.  He was arrested for driving too slowly

 

The correct answer is????? 

 

#2. He is a Nascar driver

Speed.jpg
Posted on October 16, 2013 .

The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan

rebellion.jpg

Ronald Reagan's legacy must include his influence in bringing down the Berlin Wall, the re-unification of Germany and the end to the Cold War with the Soviet Union.  The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan by James Mann, a former foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times, documents the President's ability to stick by his instincts, even though his "experts" were always skittish.

Mann also does an admirable job of giving the reader an inside look at how foreign policy was conducted between Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, sometimes using an American author as an informal intermediary. This drove the State Department crazy, but Reagan liked Suzanne Massie's books and her take on what was happening inside the Soviet Union. His relationship with Massie and the extent of her influence were certainly extraordinary.

What I enjoyed most about The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan is how it delves into Reagan's knack for reading people and seeing things that others in his sphere couldn't fathom. The hawkish members of his administration had no faith in Gorbachev being any different than the Soviet leaders before him and they always argued a hard line, as did former president Richard Nixon.

Reagan, however, could see that Gorbachev was different and he began to ease off his "evil empire" rhetoric and worked with the Soviet leader. Reagan wasn't an academic or foreign policy specialist, but he understood people. He used stories to communicate, often unsuccessfully. But the guy was not called the "Great Communicator" for nothing. Nevertheless, Mann gives Mikhail Gorbachev most of the credit for the Cold War's end.

"Unquestionably, Gorbachev played the leading role in bringing the four-decade-old conflict to a close. Yet Reagan, overcoming considerable opposition of his own at home, played  a crucial role by buttressing Gorbachev's political position," Mann concludes in his book. 

Another aspect of the book I loved were interviews in recent years with Gorbachev, East German leaders, foreign policy specialists from the Reagan Administration and others who were directly involved in this drama. These interviews provided rich context for understanding what had transpired and who deserved the credit for the successes.

 The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan worked for me because it was so smartly written in a journalistic, easy-to-read, even-handed style. It does not come off as a boring text book, despite its heavy content. In presenting this narrative, President Reagan is neither glorified nor crucified, so he emerges as a very human figure who was in the right chair at the right time, at least when it came to US-Soviet relations.

Posted on October 8, 2013 .

Are the Media Still Relevant?

Emeritus Professor Jim Hoyt

James Hoyt, a University of Wisconsin emeritus journalism professor, delivered a sobering critique of both modern journalism and the "news" consuming public during a Madison South Rotary luncheon today.

"The public doesn't care about sources as much as you and I do," lamented Professor Hoyt, a Hall of Fame inductee of the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association. "We often have no idea how carefully or recklessly the information has been gathered," he said.

Too many news organizations carry stories "second-hand," according to Hoyt, which originate from sources which provided content that is "politically loaded...less for information and more for ammunition." And he says we as consumers are often guilty of seeking out such content because it satisfies our viewpoint. Rather than seeking facts from trusted journalists, Hoyt says more of us are going to sources of information that provide one side of the story.

Such news content competition now comes from more sources than ever...which "creates a huge dilemma for the established media,"  says Professor Hoyt. Websites, bloggers, Twitter, Facebook and other sources are just a few examples. He says media outlets tend to run stories initiated by sources that do not meet their own journalistic standards because the information is so ubiquitous they feel obligated to report it.

An example of such sources, according to Hoyt, are commercial talk radio broadcasters, whom he refers to as "radio entertainers," rather than journalists. For the audiences they serve, he says "fairness can actually get in the way." For these talkers, all that matters is that they attract enough advertising dollars. Offering both sides of an argument is not required or needed for their programs to thrive.

On the other hand, Hoyt praised public broadcasters for going to great lengths to provide context, balance and a thorough discussion of the issues. But unfortunately, he says a relatively small portion of listeners and viewers are availing themselves of public broadcasting content. 

News makers are not immune from these enormous changes in the media landscape, either. Hoyt mentioned Madison's Mary Burke as example of what has happened with news sources in the modern age. Today the Madison School Board member announced via YouTube that she is running for Wisconsin Governor.

Public figures don't make announcements as often at news conferences any more, but instead avoid any pointed questions from journalists by simply releasing a statement or video directly to the public via social media, according to Hoyt.

"More and more politicians are going it alone," Professor Hoyt says, and essentially ignoring mainstream journalism. Why run your message through a skeptical press when you can bypass them?

"A balanced and thorough story will create enemies," Hoyt explains, and that appears to be hindering sound reporting today. 

The answer to all of these weighty issues is not clear, according to Hoyt. But as consumers of information, be it found on the front page of a major newspaper or via YouTube, Hoyt strongly recommends we all consider the source of that content.

When we lack a common foundation based on fact rather than assertion, it becomes increasingly difficult to have a productive conversation. Perhaps today's political stalemate in Washington, D.C. is the most obvious example of what havoc can result when so many citizens are largely misinformed. 

One might also wonder whether the state of journalism has anything to do with Wisconsin's curious electorate, which voted for liberal Tammy Baldwin and conservative Ron Johnson for Congress, while also supporting President Obama and Governor Scott Walker.

 

Posted on October 7, 2013 .